It used to be the debt was like the weather – everyone
complained about it but no one wanted to do anything about it. Now the debt is
more like a girlfriend you broke up with years ago – you know she’s still out
there somewhere, but she doesn’t really come to mind much, and you like it that way. I think the debt is
really more like the anvil plummeting down on Wile E. Coyote – he may not be
thinking about it, but it’s gonna flatten him all the same.
What do you do about
debt?
When a family or business borrows money, they have one of two
rational plans: they’ve already budgeted the money to repay the debt, or they
are planning on increased income to allow them to repay the debt. In the case
of US government debt, it’s been pretty clear for many years that Washington
has no stomach for paying the debt instead of spending the money elsewhere. Our
only alternative is to rely on increased income to pay. However, we are so far
into debt that we can’t do that any more.
That’s a painful conclusion, and before we accept the pain
we should understand why it’s inescapable. First, some rough numbers on the US
debt:
$19 trillion total debt.
$3.25 trillion annual receipts.
$440 billion annual deficit.
1.25% rate paid on debt, $236 billion per year.
To pay off this debt, we could cut spending – cut $440
billion first just to break even, then any more could go against the debt.
Since most of the US government spending is direct payments to individuals, moving money to paying down the debt means less money to pay to voters who keep you in office. Not much chance of that.
Some folks say the debt doesn’t matter and we should just
keep doing what we’ve been doing. At our current pace, we’ll owe $30 trillion
in just 12 years, and will have to borrow $2 billion just to make it to year
13. In 17 years, we’ll owe $43 trillion, and paying the interest on the debt
will be more than all other government spending combined. We’re headed off a
cliff, and staying the course just means that we drive off.
Another approach is to raise taxes, so that the government
takes more of the economy’s output. We increase government receipts, and use
that to pay off debt. This might sound possible, but we have two big
problems. First, every politician sells their tax increase by the new spending
it will enable; raising taxes without giving away more goodies doesn’t get many
votes. Second, at some point we are on the wrong side of the Laffer curve,
where raising taxes actually reduces government receipts (since people are
smart enough to stop working so hard when the government takes too big a
cut).
The usual smiley face alternative says that we’ll grow the
economy, and paying off today’s debt will be easy as our economy makes more
money (and the government gets its cut in taxes). This was always my preferred
explanation. It just required better government, and the ingenuity and work
ethic of the American people, and everything would be ok. Unfortunately, the US
debt is now so large that we can no longer grow our way out of it.
This doesn’t seem right. If we get a raise at work, we can just set
some of the raise aside to pay down our individual debt. That’s classic “get out of debt”
advice. It doesn't work for the US debt because the rate of economic growth is
tied to the interest rate the US has to pay on the debt, and that changes
everything.
What is this tie? Imagine you’re an investor, with a few
billion dollars to manage. You can invest in US debt, or in US companies. If
you invest in US debt, your return is the interest rate paid on government
bonds. If you invest in US companies, your rate of return (on average) is the
rate of growth of the US economy. If the economy grows faster, then the US must
offer to pay higher interest rates or all the money will go to equity
investments in companies. This is logically true, and borne out by many years
of evidence. The yield on US government bonds tracks very closely to the rate
of economic growth. In fact, when those rates diverge from the historical link
it’s time to change your bond/equity investments.
The numbers that kill
us.
The US economy is currently growing at about 1.25% per year.
The interest rate paid on the US debt is similar. We already know what happens
if everything stays the same – we drive off a cliff in a decade or so. If we
are going to grow our way out of debt, we have to increase the rate of economic
growth. What happens if we increase economic growth to 3% per year? Tax
receipts go up by $97 billion, but interest on the debt goes up by $334
billion. Our annual deficit increases to $675 billion, and we reach the cliff a
lot sooner.
What if we get more aggressive, and increase economic growth
to 12% per year? Tax receipts go up by $390 billion, but interest on the debt
goes up by $2 trillion. We run off the cliff tomorrow.
The core problem is not government debt. It’s that
government debt is so large – so large that changes in interest have
overwhelming impact, and so large that government interest rates and economic
growth are linked. Our individual debts are so small that we don’t have any
real effect on interest rates, so we can work more hours and make more money
without increasing the interest we pay. The government, however, has to pay
more interest when we all try to work harder
The other alternative, and the one most countries have
followed, is to inflate away the debt. We just add a few zeroes to all our
dollar bills, and pay the debt with those reduced value dollars. This works,
but only once. The interest rate paid by the government also reflects
investors’ expectations of inflation. If investors expect that the government
will reduce the value of the dollar, then investors will want interest to cover
that decrease in value. You can hit investors with massive, unexpected
inflation once, when they’re not expecting it. Everyone holding US government
debt gets hit with a huge loss, but we’ve reduced our debt. The problem is that
you can’t borrow any more. This contributed to the collapse of the Roman
empire, the defeat of the colonial Spanish empire, the transition from the
French Revolution to Napolean’s dictatorship, the continuing disasters in
Argentina’s economy. Hyperinflation is like a bankruptcy – you can do it once,
but you have to have your house in order for a long time after. If we can’t get
our house in order today, will we be able to then?
What should we
do? We should quit throwing money away on unproductive, unaccountable
government-dictated activities. We should realize that we cannot vote our way
to prosperity, that we cannot vote out the laws of reality, that we cannot vote
a chicken in every pot – we have to raise the chickens, and make the pots. We
probably won’t.
What will we do?
Probably the same thing every society before us has done. An increasing
majority of us will vote to try to push reality away for another week or two.
That will work, until it doesn’t. The deeper we dig the hole, the more it will
hurt when we fall into it.
What do you think? Is there another road? What do you do as an individual when the US car is headed off a cliff?
There does not seem to be any alternative other than stop all govt spending, save Police, Judiciary, and Military. Let interest rates rise to their natural level, and allow the market and much of industry to crash. Maintain order as good as can, and allow the economy to heal itself without any govt intervention..
ReplyDeletenot an expert on economics, but always learning.
I think you are more right than it appears. We *will* do what you note, the only question is whether we will do it voluntarily before we crash, or involuntarily when that is all we have left. Thanks for thinking.
Delete